Last week I read the book Torture Team by Philippe Sands. The book concerns an investigation into the use of torture at Guantanamo Bay through interviews with those who were blamed or had a role in authorising the use of torture on prisoners. While a fascinating read in and of itself, the part that particularly struck me was the connection made between those who were performing the acts of torture and their fascination with the show 24.
At the time the documented torture took place, Fall 2002 – Spring 2003, the show was in its second series and the ‘ticking time bomb’ scenario was first presented. The series thus opened with the use of some sort of chemical or biological torture being performed on a ‘terrorist’ who then moments later confirmed that he indeed know of a massive terrorist attack that would take place in America and thus kick started an investigation and saving of the country. What’s fascinating, and scary, to me is that it was this type of mentality that created the culture of torture within our military facility; the notion that torture works and that by applying techniques we will be saving lives. All of this took place despite the actual evidence of torture being known by the FBI to be ineffective, damaging and counter-productive. Despite the facts, however, somehow people were able to have their opinions and convictions changed by the imagery presented in a fictional representation of events that have never actually taken place.
But the issue of 24 opening up the doorways to torture is nothing new; we have long since seen politicians and commentators referring to “Jack Bauer” justice as being something needed in the ‘war on terror’. It was just surprising to me that the methods of torture, and their associated permissibility for the individual carrying out the measure, were extremely similar to those portrayed in the series. In other words, the tactics invoked were inspired by fictional portrayal of necessity and outcomes.
I think it is certainly safe to say that this type of activity, the internalisation and processing of entertainment media into the mutation of cultural norms, takes place every day... but this particular issue seemed to strike at the core of so many individuals that they consciously altered and circumvented the legal review and normal procedures that they should have followed because they believed so strongly that what they were doing was right. A conviction that could only be reached by the assurance that the actions employed are accepted by their peers.